Sourcing: one in a series of short letters to a bunch of important people; Violant’s purpose here appears to be to take on a coordinating role for all matters in the succession process; Violant, in Barcelona, also has access to all sorts of power brokers and courtiers; Violant’s experience growing up in the Parisian court of Charles V, as well as her experience as the Duchess of Girona, has provided her with the skills and cultural capital to understand who to trust
Contextualization: Violant’s likely number one fear is an insurrection or the emergence of a pretender to the throne; fortunately, Martí’s loyalty appears solid; the preceding months seem to have been free of political or economic crises and that also works in favor of Violant’s effort to project stability and orderliness in the succession process; the exercise of power in this document can also be informed by recent developments in queenship studies, specifically the move ‘beyond exceptionalism.’ 2
Corroboration: this is one in a series of documents that Violant wrote about several administrative matters, as well as sending out notices of her ascension to queenship
Close-Reading: this document also appears as an illustrative example in Claire Ponsich’s article on Violant that traces the development of her authority through the phrasing of her letters; following Ponsich, I consider the tone of this document authoritative and commanding, operating as a political partner of equal status with Martí
What is this document doing?
This document furthers Violant’s project of assuming administrative authority over the political operations of the Crown of Aragon in a full partnership with Joan and Martí.
The document demonstrates the extent to which politically powerful women in the Crown of Aragon could exercise their will over the fates of others (ie. imprisoned political opponents).
The document lays a foundation, establishing a record that could operate as a justification, even a tradition, for Violant’s political action in the future.
Questions
How was the relationship between Violant and Martí at this point? Did she see him as a subordinate?
Did Violant write this letter with a sense of expanding the boundaries of her political power or did this fit within her longheld expectations for her role as queen? Did she compose this letter without hesitation?
What was the role of the Count of Pallars in helping Sibilla?
Is it implied in this letter that Sibilla is to be treated similarly to the Count of Pallars?
Who can Violant trust in Barcelona?
How does Martí see Violant? As a partner? A superior?
When is Martí expected to return to Barcelona?
Bibliography
Earenfight, Theresa. “Absent Kings: Queens as Political Partners in the Medieval Crown of Aragon.” In Queenship and Political Power in Medieval and Early Modern Spain, edited by Theresa Earenfight. Ashgate, 2005.
Earenfight, Theresa. “A Lifetime of Power, Beyond Binaries of Gender.” In Medieval Elite Women and the Exercise of Power, 1100–1400: Moving beyond the Exceptionalist Debate, edited by Heather J. Tanner, 271-293. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
Kelleher, Marie A. “What Do We Mean by” Women and Power”?” Medieval Feminist Forum: A Journal of Gender and Sexuality 51, no. 2 (2016): 104–15.
Ponsich, Claire. ‘De la parole d’apaisement au reproche: un glissement rhétorique du conseil ou l’engagement politique d’une reine d’Aragon?,’ Cahiers d’études Hispaniques Medievales 31 (2008): 81–117.
Tanner, Heather J., ed. Medieval Elite Women and the Exercise of Power, 1100–1400: Moving beyond the Exceptionalist Debate. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
partially transcribed by Claire Ponsich, ‘De la parole d’apaisement au reproche: un glissement rhétorique du conseil ou l’engagement politique d’une reine d’Aragon?,’ Cahiers d’études Hispaniques Medievales 31 (2008): 81–117, at 98. ↩
Heather J. Tanner ed., Medieval Elite Women and the Exercise of Power, 1100–1400: Moving beyond the Exceptionalist Debate (Palgrave Macmillan, 2019). ↩