Joan intervenes in a custody case for an orphan in Valencia.
Episode 100
ACA CR R1825 f97v Source: PARES
Sourcing: as king, Joan had the final say in any civil disputes as well as matters of state and criminal cases; the two men in this letter perhaps had a desire to appropriate some of Bernardona’s inheritance
Contextualization: the monarchs of the Middle Ages would sometimes rule on cases that in modern political systems would never rise to the level of the head of state; there were levels of jurisdictions for courts and local magistrates, but the monarch still held the position of final arbiter for difficult cases and hear appeals
Corroboration: this is the first custody case that has come up in the podcast, but document examined in Episode 95 also relates to a family dispute
Close-Reading: the word ‘pubilla’ signals that Bernardona is quite young, probably younger than ten years old;
As the 100th episode of the podcast, this episode includes a review of the main goals of the project. This episode also takes stock of how AI tools have developed since December 2025, explaining the current capabilities of Transkribus and agentic AI, specifically OpenClaw.
I used Gemini for an initial transcription, which I then had Claude reconcile with its own initial transcription. Claude then produced a translation into English with footnotes.
Gemini and Claude both identified Bernardona as an heiress and I had not understood that aspect of the document until after I reviewed the LLM transcription and analysis.
I had ChatGPT du a cursory search in the secondary literature accessible to it for information about this case but it didn’t find any results.